Update From the Medical Journals: October 2011 October 28, 2011 By Mary Pickett, M.D. What's the latest news in the medical journals this month? Find out what your doctor is reading.
Men Should Stop Having the PSA Test Almost two-thirds of men who are older than 50 have had at least one screening PSA (prostate specific antigen) test. This blood test checks for prostate cancer. But the PSA test has been controversial. In 2010, the American Cancer Society said doctors should not automatically offer the test. Instead, according to that recommendation, they should talk with patients about how uncertain we are about the benefits of the test. Now, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPFTF) says men at low risk for prostate cancer should not be screened at all. The test does more harm than good, according to the USPFTF. This group published a draft of its recommendations online October 7. The group is inviting readers to comment. The PSA test mostly finds early-stage prostate cancer. Task force members cited a study that found two out of five cancers found after a PSA test were too slow growing to ever cause harm. About 90% of men diagnosed with prostate cancer are treated, and the number of lives saved is very small. The treatment for prostate cancer often leaves men with long-term, undesirable side effects. These include loss of sexual function, incontinence (leaking urine), rectal spasms or urgency to have a bowel movement. The most common treatment for prostate cancer is surgery to remove the prostate. It is called prostatectomy. The chance of dying during this operation is about 1 in 200. The USPFTF points out, "The vast majority of men who are treated do not have prostate cancer death prevented or lives extended from that treatment." But men who are treated "are subjected to significant harms." African-American men and men with a family history of prostate cancer (relatives who were younger than 65 when their cancers were found) are more likely to have aggressive cancers. Despite the extra risk, the USPSTF is not recommending screening for these men. The new recommendation does not apply to men who have symptoms such as difficulty urinating or blood in the urine. The PSA test might still be useful to check for cancer in men with symptoms.
Women Should Have Fewer Pap Tests, Says New Guidelines Less than two weeks after its PSA test recommendation, the USPSTF published guidelines saying women should have fewer Pap tests. The guideline was released online by the USPSTF on October 18. A Pap test (also called a Papanicolaou smear) collects a sample of cells from the surface of the cervix to check for changes that can lead to cervical cancer. After reviewing the evidence, the USPFTF says Pap tests save lives, but they also have drawbacks. First, having a Pap test usually means having a pelvic exam. Second, the test has a fairly high false-positive rate. After a positive result, the doctor will do a colposcopy. This procedure examines the cervix with a magnifying lens. Sometimes the doctor takes a sample of tissue (biopsy) for examination. The USPSTF says having Pap smears every three years is a good way to balance the risks and the benefits of the screening test. Women ages 21 to 65 who have a normal Pap test can repeat the test once every three years. (Previously, women who had not yet had their first three Pap tests were told to have the test every year. Also, women who had multiple sexual partners and women who had any previous history of a sexually transmitted infection (STI) were advised to have yearly Pap tests. But in the new recommendation even these women can have the test once every three years.) If a woman has had her uterus removed, she does not need to continue having Pap tests. The revised guidelines only apply to women who have normal Pap tests. Women who have had an abnormal Pap test should follow the existing recommendations for more frequent testing.
Studies Show Best Breast Cancer Treatments According to a new study, the breast cancer drug letrozole (Femara) does a better job of preventing the cancer from returning and increases survival time compared with the drug tamoxifen (Nolvadex and other brands). The journal Lancet Oncology published the results October 20. The study involved more than 8,000 women with breast cancer. Compared with women who took tamoxifen, breast cancer survivors who took letrozole for five years were 20% less likely to die or have their cancer return in their first 12 years after their initial cancer treatment. Combining the two drugs was no better than getting letrozole alone. Letrozole and tamoxifen are given to patients whose cancers test positive for estrogen receptors on the cancer cells. This study will make letrozole the first choice for cancer drug treatment after surgery. In a separate study published October 19, having radiation treatment after breast cancer surgery was shown to cut the risk of a recurrence in half for 10 years after treatment. Compared with women who did not get radiation, death rates for women who had the treatments were lower by about one-sixth 15 years after the treatments. This study looked at more than 10,000 breast cancer patients. It was published online by the Lancet. Radiation is usually recommended after surgery for breast cancer. This study will make that recommendation even stronger.
Mary Pickett, M.D. is an Associate professor at Oregon Health & Science University where she is a primary care doctor for adults. She supervises and educates residents in the field of Internal Medicine, for outpatient and hospital care. She is a Lecturer for Harvard Medical School and a Senior Medical Editor for Harvard Health Publications.
|