Back to last page

Default Silo Topic
24479
Export Perspectives
News Review From Harvard Medical School -- Mammograms Backed for Women 50 to 69
News Review From Harvard Medical School -- Mammograms Backed for Women 50 to 69
htmMammogramsValue0914
For women from ages 50 to 69, getting a mammogram saves lives. That's the conclusion of a new review of research. About 7 to 9 lives are saved for every 1,000 women who get mammograms every 2 years, the study found. That benefit outweighs potential harms, the authors concluded. Harms might include anxiety and treatments that some women don't really need. The new analysis was based on studies in Europe and the actual experience of breast cancer screening programs there. It found that about 4 women for every 1,000 tested were "overdiagnosed." This means the cancers found would not have been detected otherwise or caused any problems during their lives. Researchers also estimated other results for each group of 1,000 women tested. About 200 would have at least one recall visit and an extra test that showed they did not have cancer. Of those, 170 would have a test that did not involve surgery. The other 30 would have an invasive procedure (such as a biopsy). Overdiagnosis and extra tests were considered harms because they were not needed. The Journal of Medical Screening published the study. HealthDay News and MedPage Today wrote about it September 13.
1455238
InteliHealth
2012-09-14
f
A Perspective From The Harvard Medical School
2014-03-14
News Review From Harvard Medical School

September 14, 2012


News Review From Harvard Medical School -- Mammograms Backed for Women 50 to 69

For women from ages 50 to 69, getting a mammogram saves lives. That's the conclusion of a new review of research. About 7 to 9 lives are saved for every 1,000 women who get mammograms every 2 years, the study found. That benefit outweighs potential harms, the authors concluded. Harms might include anxiety and treatments that some women don't really need. The new analysis was based on studies in Europe and the actual experience of breast cancer screening programs there. It found that about 4 women for every 1,000 tested were "overdiagnosed." This means the cancers found would not have been detected otherwise or caused any problems during their lives. Researchers also estimated other results for each group of 1,000 women tested. About 200 would have at least one recall visit and an extra test that showed they did not have cancer. Of those, 170 would have a test that did not involve surgery. The other 30 would have an invasive procedure (such as a biopsy). Overdiagnosis and extra tests were considered harms because they were not needed. The Journal of Medical Screening published the study. HealthDay News and MedPage Today wrote about it September 13.


By Howard LeWine, M.D.
Harvard Medical School


What Is the Doctor's Reaction?

Women routinely subject their breasts to the often uncomfortable exam called a mammogram. They endure because they believe it can detect breast cancer at an early stage. And catching it early means that it will likely be easier to treat, helping to save lives.

Indeed, a mammogram does find small cancers that no woman or doctor would be able to feel. But more often than not, the worrisome spots detected turn out not to be cancers. These are called false positives. But the spots can't be just ignored. The result is more tests and worry.

Science has been trying for years to weigh the benefits of finding early breast cancers vs. the risks related to false positives. This has led to major debates about the pros and cons of mammograms to screen for breast cancer. Some studies suggest that this test does not live up to the hype. But most experts recommend that women go have regular breast cancer screening with mammograms.

However, well respected groups have had very different opinions about when and how often to do screening. Discussions have focused on:

This new article is based on a review of the results of breast screening on millions of European women. The review supports the advice that women ages 50 to 69 have a mammogram once every 2 years. The researchers estimated that for every 1,000 women screened, 7 to 9 lives were saved.

During the 20-year period when they got mammograms, 200 women out of 1,000 were called back for more tests that did not show any cancer. Of these, 170 received non-invasive testing. The other 30 had invasive tests. Non-invasive tests include a repeat mammogram, an ultrasound and/or an MRI. Invasive procedures include a biopsy and/or surgery.

The results of the review were published online September 13 in The Journal of Medical Screening.

What Changes Can I Make Now?

If you have had some doubts about getting mammograms when you reach age 50, this study should help sway you.

But if you have a higher than average risk of breast cancer, you may need to have regular mammograms starting at a younger age. You also may need to have them more often than once every two years.

Reasons for women to have a higher risk of breast cancer include:

Other factors also can increase your risk of breast cancer. They might not change how often you need breast cancer screening. But they make it that much more important for you to have routine mammograms. They include:

What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?

The findings in this review suggest that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force got it right. The task force recently recommended that women ages 50 to 74 have a mammogram once every 2 years. The group includes experts from several different specialties. So it's highly likely that this is unbiased advice.



Last updated September 14, 2012


   
breast cancer,mammogram,radiation,cancer,alcohol,biopsy,surgery
36146
dmtContent