Chrome 2001
.
The Trusted Source InteliHealth Aetna InteliHealth Aetna InteliHealth
Enter Drug Name . Enter Search Term
     
. .
. .
.
Home
Health Commentaries
InteliHealth Dental
Drug Resource Center
Ask the Expert
Interactive Tools

InteliHealth Policies
Site Map
Diseases & Conditions Healthy Lifestyle Your Health Look It Up
Health News Health News
.
Associated Press

Gel Implants A Concern For Advisory Panel
November 5, 2003

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a highly unusual move, the chairman of a government advisory panel that reluctantly backed resuming sales of silicone gel breast implants now is urging federal health officials and lawmakers to disregard that advice.

"I really have a lot of angst" about the panel's vote, said Dr. Thomas Whalen of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School. "I felt morally compelled -- it sounds corny, but morally compelled -- to do something about it."

Silicone gel implants were highly popular until 1992, when fears that leaking silicone caused serious diseases prompted the Food and Drug Administration to end routine sales. Now one manufacturer is seeking an end to the ban, arguing that silicone implants have been exonerated of causing serious diseases like cancer or lupus.

Last month, the FDA asked outside scientists for advice. In a two-day meeting, dozens of women blamed silicone implants for permanent disfigurement and dozens more begged for access to them.

The advisers recommended, on a 9-6 vote, the sale again of implants but only under very strict conditions. These include additional safety tests and warnings to recipients about lingering safety questions and the frequent need for repeated operations because of painful scar tissue and other problems.

As the panel's chairman, Whalen could not vote unless there was a tie. But in a letter obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press, he wrote FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan and five members of Congress about his "very strong reservations concerning this vote."

"Long-term safety, the concern that prompted the removal from the market 11 years ago, was clearly not demonstrated," Whalen wrote.

Also "extraordinarily troubling," he added, is the enormous costs that women face for additional surgeries and removal of broken or painful implants. "This is a public health issue of no small import that must be addressed should the FDA second this misguided panel decision," Whalen said.

The FDA said it had received and would consider Whalen's comments.

Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

.
InteliHealth
. . . .
.
More News
InteliHealth .
.
Top News
General Health
This Week In Health
Addiction
Allergy
Alzheimer's
Asthma
Arthritis
Babies
Breast Cancer
Cancer
Caregiving
Cervical Cancer
Children's Health
Cholesterol
Complementary & Alternative Medicine
Dental / Oral Health
Depression
Diabetes
Ear, Nose And Throat
Eyes
Family Health
Fitness
Headache
Heart Health
HIV / AIDS
Infectious Diseases
Lung Cancer
Medications
Men's Health
Mental Health
Nutrition News
Multiple Sclerosis
Nutrition Guide
Parkinson's
Pregnancy
Prevention
Prostate Cancer
Senior Health
Sexual / Reproductive Health
Sleep
Tobacco Cessation
STDs
Stress Reduction
Stroke
Weight Management
Today In Health History
Women's Health
Workplace Health
.
.
.
.
InteliHealth

   
.
.   HONcode
.
Chrome 2001
Chrome 2001